Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. I now realize that it's
> a bit silly to do that when the plain-C files (of which there are
> plenty) ar
For Mozilla, see
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/C___Portability_Guide#Don%27t_use_exceptions
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593768
Takanori
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 19.1.2011 07:53, Haïkel Guémar napsal(a):
> > Morale: that's just *PLAIN USELESS* to only remove the -fexceptions f
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
>> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
>> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
>> ...
>> Seems like I should either drop the no
Tom Lane writes:
> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
-fexceptions / -frtti are essentially harmless, so I am curious why
they were ever thought to
Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
-felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. I now realize that it's
a bit silly to do that when the plain-C files (of which there are
plenty) are being built with -fexcep
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> hi,
>
> after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the
> -fexceptions flag won't change anything.
> -fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default
> when compiling C++, then you have to use the
Dne 19.1.2011 07:53, Haïkel Guémar napsal(a):
> Morale: that's just *PLAIN USELESS* to only remove the -fexceptions from
> flags, anyway, it's already there. And sleeping might be a good thing.
+1 for a good example of disaster which IMHO happens see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51
hi,
after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the
-fexceptions flag won't change anything.
-fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default
when compiling C++, then you have to use the -fno-exceptions flag
instead if you really want to disable that fe
so, -fexception is mandatory for building C++ libraries @ Fedora?
--
w
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:08:37PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> -fexception allows a C library to participate in C++ exception
> handling. It does not cost anything except extra data tables in the
> ELF file. Its presence matters in cases where a C library is used by
> a C++ program, for exam
Pierre-Yves writes:
> [...]
> I have been looking into the review #668863 in which the packager for
> this library (who also happens to be upstream) is actually removing the
> flag "-fexceptions" from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the %build.
> [...]
> - Upstream does not want to have this flag on, saying t
Hi,
I have been looking into the review #668863 in which the packager for
this library (who also happens to be upstream) is actually removing the
flag "-fexceptions" from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the %build.
Asking this question on irc (on fedora-devel) as lead to a small
discussion without clear agreem
12 matches
Mail list logo
