On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:10:03AM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > Once upon a time, Jan Staněk said:
> > >> The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this l
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Jan Staněk writes:
>> Hi guys,
>> as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
>> previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
>> cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for go
Jan Staněk writes:
> Hi guys,
> as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
> previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
> cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
> - or at least trim down the list of packages dependen
On 8.1.2015 14:56, Jan Staněk wrote:
> Hi guys,
> as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
> previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
> cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
> - or at least trim down the list of
On 01/08/2015 06:56 AM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of pac
Am 08.01.2015 um 16:10 schrieb David Cantrell:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Why does v6 having an incompatible license mean we should get rid of v5?
BerkeleyDB is widely used because it meets a need, and v5 meet
On 01/08/2015 04:10 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
It's not a drop-in replacement, but I have seen sqlite be a viable option
for projects wanting some database library and wanting a stable API. Many
upstream projects that can use berkdb have grown sqlite support as an
option.
And SQLite shares one
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Jan Staněk wrote:
> However, as I have only very hazy ideas on how some of the dependent
> packages are used or why they need libdb, I would like to ask for
> cooperation, ideally from the package maintainers themselves. The
> information on how to remove dependency
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Jan Staněk said:
> >> The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
> >> [1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple li
On 01/08/2015 02:56 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of pac
Am 08.01.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Jan Staněk said:
The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
[1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple libdb
versions in system is very problematic. As some packages cannot use
newer ve
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jan Staněk said:
>> The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
>> [1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple libdb
>> versions in system is very problematic. As some packages cann
On 08/01/15 13:56, Jan Staněk wrote:
However, as I have only very hazy ideas on how some of the dependent
packages are used or why they need libdb, I would like to ask for
cooperation, ideally from the package maintainers themselves. The
information on how to remove dependency, what would need t
Once upon a time, Jan Staněk said:
> The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
> [1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple libdb
> versions in system is very problematic. As some packages cannot use
> newer versions, we are basically stuck with v5 -
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of packages dependent on it as much as
possible.
15 matches
Mail list logo
