On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:13 +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:06:15AM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > Which reminds me - are we prepared from the marketing perspective? I can
> > imagine Phoronix.com to publish an article "Red Hat reaches million
> > bugs". We should have s
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:06:15AM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Which reminds me - are we prepared from the marketing perspective? I can
> imagine Phoronix.com to publish an article "Red Hat reaches million
> bugs". We should have some PR prepared explaining that we track features
> there (I can
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> IMHO there's probably a case for filing a bug with upstream cloud-init
> and getting them to drop something like:
>
> Environment=PATH=[some predictable path]
>
> into cloud-init-0.7.2/systemd/cloud-*.service.
Oh, good point. Tha
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:06:00PM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hey,
>
> since we provide cloud images starting with Fedora 19, I noticed that
> cloud-init, which is used in these, does not execute user shell scripts
> with $PATH set properly which is causing issues for packages that does
> not
Hey,
since we provide cloud images starting with Fedora 19, I noticed that
cloud-init, which is used in these, does not execute user shell scripts
with $PATH set properly which is causing issues for packages that does
not provide full paths in scriplets.
I know we have some examples which relies
