On 01/04/21 12:36 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:
On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.s
On 01/04/21 11:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work
* Jonathan Wakely:
> On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
>>start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
>>references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
>>intended, and so w
On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so will not be present in the fi
On 31/03/21 14:25 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/03/21 15:00 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 31.03.2021 11:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I can start the same rebuilds in rawhide now to avoid the version
skew.
Please merge your commit from f34 instead of doing another one:
fed
On 31/03/21 15:00 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 31.03.2021 11:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I can start the same rebuilds in rawhide now to avoid the version
skew.
Please merge your commit from f34 instead of doing another one:
fedpkg switch-branch rawhide
git merge f34
Yes, ob
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 31/03/21 11:46 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>I do not see such symbol references for dotnet5.0. I have
>
> Agreed, I downloaded dotnet-runtime-5.0-5.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm and
> checked it too (although not the other subpackages in that build).
>
>>double-checke
On 31.03.2021 11:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I can start the same rebuilds in rawhide now to avoid the version
skew.
Please merge your commit from f34 instead of doing another one:
fedpkg switch-branch rawhide
git merge f34
fedpkg build --nowait
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easyc
On 30.03.2021 18:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Package maintainers should not need to do anything, but will see a
%release bump and a rebuild.
In future, please commit to rawhide branch too. I want to keep my Git
history linear to avoid any merge conflicts between branches.
Also pushing the new
On 31/03/21 11:46 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Omair Majid:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work a
* Omair Majid:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
>> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
>> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
>> intended, and so will not be pr
On 31/03/21 09:10 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 18:13, Jonathan Wakely
a écrit :
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do
* Nicolas Chauvet:
> Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 18:13, Jonathan Wakely
> a écrit :
>>
>> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
>> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
>> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
>>
On 30/03/21 18:24 -0400, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so w
Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 18:13, Jonathan Wakely
a écrit :
>
> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
> intended, and so will not be
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
> intended, and so will not be present in the final gcc-11.
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so will not be present in the final gcc-11.1.0 release.
See https://bugzilla.red
17 matches
Mail list logo
