Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:40:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote > >> built against Qt 4.6 WILL NOT WORK AT ALL with Qt 4.5!!! (This is >> always the case, Qt is backwards- but not forwards- compatible.) > > And sometimes not even that. I rather suspect this bug is caused > by the u

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-28 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:40:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote > built against Qt 4.6 WILL NOT WORK AT ALL with Qt 4.5!!! (This is > always the case, Qt is backwards- but not forwards- compatible.) And sometimes not even that. I rather suspect this bug is caused by the update from 4.5 to 4.6: https

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Till Maas wrote: > Now that I know the command to do this, here it is: > > $ koji latest-pkg dist-f12-build qt | grep override > > If this returns something, the package must only be moved to stable > together with the big qt update. Right, I should have included this hint, thanks for pointing t

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:41:59PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I wrote: > > for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, > > but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to > > push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Rex Dieter
Tom Lane wrote: > I guess I am wondering why such a change is being made in a "stable" > branch in the first place. Why isn't this sort of thing strictly > rawhide material? To be clear, it's a backward, but not forward compatible change in question, which similarly affects lots of newer softwa

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Kofler writes: > I wrote: >> for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, >> but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to >> push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt your >> package got built against and DO NO

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
I wrote: > for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, > but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to > push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt your > package got built against and DO NOT PUSH your update to stable

Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt your package got built against and DO NOT PUSH your update to stable before t