On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 09:25:37 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> neither Ekiga nor Linphone can make a call with http://voocall.cz SIP
> provider. It works with Twinkle. (All F-18.)
>
> Ekiga Bug with pcaps: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705783
> Linphone Bug with pcaps: https://bugzilla
Hi,
neither Ekiga nor Linphone can make a call with http://voocall.cz SIP
provider. It works with Twinkle. (All F-18.)
Ekiga Bug with pcaps: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705783
Linphone Bug with pcaps: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995791
SIP provider posted entry [C
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:36:57AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:03:16 +0100, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > > Has Fedora *ever* had a functional soft-phone? I ask this because I
> > > have tried many, and none
2013/3/12 Richard W.M. Jones :
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> On 03/09/2013 12:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > So, I am going to retire this package in rawhide soon unless there's
>> > folks with a very strong C++ background wishing to fix issues and
>> > basically
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> I've tried several other things this morning, but it doesn't seem
> nearly stable enough to be my "daily driver" softphone. Time to go
> try out Ekiga again, it seems.
I know it's usually bad form to reply to yourself on a mailing list --
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> It might have improved in f18, I got sick of trying and no response from the
> maintainer to abrt reports
I too have had problems getting any sort of response from the
maintainer, but I'm always one to give second chances.
On a whim, I dec
- Original Message -
> On 2013-03-12, 22:28 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > The main showstopper there is that they almost all directly or
> > indirectly (e.g. through libmediastreamer) depend on FFmpeg. Ekiga
> > seems to be the only one using GStreamer. :-(
>
> And telepathy-rakia (I positi
On 13 Mar 2013 08:02, "Matej Cepl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-03-12, 23:11 GMT, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I've never managed to make that work, when ever I configure it all I
> > get is a crash.
>
> Using sip.redhat.com (that's eZuce OpenUC) I have just made a call to my
> cellphone. I have telepathy-raki
On 2013-03-12, 23:11 GMT, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I've never managed to make that work, when ever I configure it all I
> get is a crash.
Using sip.redhat.com (that's eZuce OpenUC) I have just made a call to my
cellphone. I have telepathy-rakia-0.7.4-3.
Best,
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2013-03-12, 22:28 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> The main showstopper there is that they almost all directly or
>> indirectly (e.g. through libmediastreamer) depend on FFmpeg. Ekiga
>> seems to be the only one using GStreamer. :-(
>
> And telep
On 2013-03-12, 22:28 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The main showstopper there is that they almost all directly or
> indirectly (e.g. through libmediastreamer) depend on FFmpeg. Ekiga
> seems to be the only one using GStreamer. :-(
And telepathy-rakia (I positively hate Empathy as UI, but the telepa
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> try to get some of the next generation open-source softphones
>> compiling for Fedora and then packaged.
>
> The main showstopper there is that they almost all directly or indirectly
> (e.g. through libmediastreamer)
Jared K. Smith wrote:
> try to get some of the next generation open-source softphones
> compiling for Fedora and then packaged.
The main showstopper there is that they almost all directly or indirectly
(e.g. through libmediastreamer) depend on FFmpeg. Ekiga seems to be the only
one using GStream
On 2013-03-12, 01:03 GMT, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> I've successfully used Twinkle for the last three or four years,
> despite its bitrot and lack of updates from upstream. I *once* had
> Ekiga working, but it gave me so many problems a few years ago that I
> had given up on it. Sounds like it's ti
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:03:16 +0100, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > Has Fedora *ever* had a functional soft-phone? I ask this because I
>> > have tried many, and none of them *ev
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:03:16 +0100, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Has Fedora *ever* had a functional soft-phone? I ask this because I
> > have tried many, and none of them *ever* worked
[...]
> I've successfully used Twinkle for the last th
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Has Fedora *ever* had a functional soft-phone? I ask this because I
> have tried many, and none of them *ever* worked -- in the usual sense
> that one would expect a phone to work, ie. not hanging or crashing or
> dropping calls or havi
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 12:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, I am going to retire this package in rawhide soon unless there's
> > folks with a very strong C++ background wishing to fix issues and
> > basically become the new upstream.
>
> Does
On 10 Mar 2013 16:53, "Ian Pilcher" wrote:
>
> On 03/09/2013 12:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, I am going to retire this package in rawhide soon unless there's
> > folks with a very strong C++ background wishing to fix issues and
> > basically become the new upstream.
>
> Does Fedora currently
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Does Fedora currently have a functional soft-phone?
Ekiga?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/09/2013 12:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, I am going to retire this package in rawhide soon unless there's
> folks with a very strong C++ background wishing to fix issues and
> basically become the new upstream.
Does Fedora currently have a functional soft-phone?
--
=
21 matches
Mail list logo