I'm not sure what dictd-server is, but I'd say if there is some issue
with SELinux, it should be considered packaging bug and you should
report it into bugzilla against the package (or alternatively against
selinux-polixy). The INSTALL file typically comes from upstream, so it
might not cover some
On 12/11/2016 08:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd instead suggest taking a look at docs:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html-single/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/index.html#sect-Security-Enhanced_Linux-Troubleshooting-Fixing_Problems
and then filing a selinux-policy bug so
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:03:43 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> stevefoley12...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Well, I must say, Fedora is not making it easy! I've used Debian
> > for a few years and I really expect to install something and have
> > it work.
> >
> > But...there are selinux issues, I guess. I rea
stevefoley12...@gmail.com wrote:
> Well, I must say, Fedora is not making it easy! I've used Debian for a few
> years and I really expect to install something and have it work.
>
> But...there are selinux issues, I guess. I really don't know about
> selinux...now I'm learning a lot. There is a fol
CORRECTION:
There is a folder labeled "selinux" in /usr/share/doc/dict-server/
I seem to remember installing Fedora years and years ago and being driven crazy
for a week trying to get apache working. I really think having a package named
"dictd-server" should just install that package. Well, i
