Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:39 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and > > possibly posted as an update? :) > > > > Would be wonderful! > > > > Try this, > http://kyle

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > I've been reading http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/402 and actually Lennart > has put some solid thoughts and arguments there and IMHO it was *somehow* > pretty convincing that this should be done at user-space, in conjunction > with tools

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi, I've been reading http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/402 and actually Lennart has put some solid thoughts and arguments there and IMHO it was *somehow* pretty convincing that this should be done at user-space, in conjunction with tools such as systemd, albeit introducing more complexity in form o

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi, 2010/11/16 Ilyes Gouta : > Hi, > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders > patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2 > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and > possibly posted a

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 08:34 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:09:49PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: >> I am having these now :-( >> > > Hi Gene, > > Looks like the author hasn't run with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP, as > its a problem with the patch against 2.6.37-rc2 as well (it's

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:09:49PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > I am having these now :-( > Hi Gene, Looks like the author hasn't run with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP, as its a problem with the patch against 2.6.37-rc2 as well (it's doing kmalloc with irqs disabled.) I'll let you know if t

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 11:58 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 11/16/2010 11:39 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >>> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and >>> possibly posted as an update? :) >>> >>> Would be wonder

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 16.11.10 11:02, Josh Stone (jist...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On 11/16/2010 09:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > This appears completely backwards to me. Attaching things like this to a > > TTY is just wrong, because normally we don't have a single TTY around on > > most graphical session

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 16.11.10 19:52, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi Leenart, > > > Dhaval Giani pointed out to me that the same can be done from userspace > > simply by creating a cgroup for each session in the cpu hierarchy. Turns > > So a session's (as you're referring) initiator to would

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi Kyle, I'm getting these while running kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.35.8-59.xsched1/ [ 234.580039] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1701 [ 234.580048] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 4272, n

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > The kernel doesn't really have a notion of what a "session" is (only the > audit subsystem kinda has), but if this grouping behaviour is supposed > to be bound to a session, then attaching it to a TTY is a pretty shitty > replac

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 09:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > This appears completely backwards to me. Attaching things like this to a > TTY is just wrong, because normally we don't have a single TTY around on > most graphical sessions. > > The kernel doesn't really have a notion of what a "session" is (onl

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi Leenart, > Dhaval Giani pointed out to me that the same can be done from userspace > simply by creating a cgroup for each session in the cpu hierarchy. Turns So a session's (as you're referring) initiator to would be the terminal emulator process that has a virtual tty and systemd detect those

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 16.11.10 16:58, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders > patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2 > > Can we have this patch back ported into the current

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 11:39 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and >> possibly posted as an update? :) >> >> Would be wonderful! >> > > Try this, > http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Thanks Kyle for making it available! -Ilyes On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 > and > > possibly posted as an update? :) > > > > Would

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi, According to phoronix, it would be queued for the 2.6.38 release. > actually works. If you really want it, Fedora provides all the tools to > build your own custom kernel package. It's already on my todo list :) -Ilyes On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and > possibly posted as an update? :) > > Would be wonderful! > Try this, http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.35.8-59.xsched1/ i686 coming whenever mock fi

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

> "IG" == Ilyes Gouta writes: IG> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for IG> Fedora 14 and possibly posted as an update? :) IG> Would be wonderful! Would be more wonderful to wait until the upstream development has actually finished before cramming it into our package

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >Hi, > > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders >patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2 >Can we have this patch back ported into the curren