On Sáb, 2016-12-24 at 14:23 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:39:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > libaudclient was no longer used by any package, so it is a good
> > time to
> > retire it for F26 . As usual who may want it, can take it .
> Why has it been r
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:39:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> libaudclient was no longer used by any package, so it is a good time to
> retire it for F26 . As usual who may want it, can take it .
Why has it been reintroduced then?
Apparently, no effort has been spent on using it within "conk
