Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, > > Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > > > This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the > > rawhide r

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:07 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the rawhide report arrives significan

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, > Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the > rawhide report arrives significantly after (over an hour later) the > test list copy.

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the rawhide report arrives significantly after (over an hour later) the test list copy. This didn't used to happen. The branched reports both arrive around th