Re: pycairo

2013-11-03 Thread Christopher Meng
So any new progress here? I haven't seen any updates still so far. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: pycairo

2013-10-24 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream release 1.10.0 but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or LGPLv2) https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/ pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License

Re: pycairo

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher Meng
On Oct 24, 2013 1:26 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > Right. So, I would suggest: > > Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new > rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get it > reviewed. > > The only slight wrinkle in this is the folks who have commit on pycai

Re: pycairo

2013-10-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:55:02 +0200 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:50:39AM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon > > > wrote: > > > > Note that the package

Re: pycairo

2013-10-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:50:39AM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon > > wrote: > > > Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename > > > review request to be com

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon > wrote: > > Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename > > review request to be completed: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Christopher Meng
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename > review request to be completed: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0 And I would ask why he can do t

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Christopher Meng
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > So, is this Review request still "live" and waiting for a reviewer, > or is is "dead", and waiting for a new prospective maintainer? > It would be great if the involved parties could provide some hints. Dead de facto. But it h

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 05:21 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:27:22AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of > > pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its > > rebuild(https://

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:27:22AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of > pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its > rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well. > > However the version in