On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:39:00 -0400
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The problem is that we'd want to know what the ramifications of the
> update are to the release. What if the fix for the FTBFS causes an
> ABI break... but it's also the only way to fix the FTBFS within our
> manpower needs? Better to d
Hi,
On 09/22/2010 07:37 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
>> Eric Smith wrote:
>>
>>> A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
>>> added a patch to resolve it and submitted a
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:38:50PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:37:44 -0400
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > For (unreleased) F14, I think that the arugment that future work on
> > the package is better off starting with something that works than to
> > start off with somethin
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:37:44 -0400
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> For (unreleased) F14, I think that the arugment that future work on
> the package is better off starting with something that works than to
> start off with something that's broken by new gcc, boost, etc is very
> valid.
Sure. I would su
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
> Eric Smith wrote:
>
> > A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
> > added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven
> > days with no feedback, I was
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:49:13 -0700
Eric Smith wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Were there reports of the existing build causing problems?
>
> I don't think there was any prior F14 build of meshlab. I got email
> for the FTBFS bug.
Yeah, there was a 1.2.2-4.fc14 build.
http://koji.fedoraproje
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Were there reports of the existing build causing problems?
I don't think there was any prior F14 build of meshlab. I got email for
the FTBFS bug.
> I don't see the point of pushing it as an update at all, unless it's
> fixing some bad behavior in the existing build or
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
Eric Smith wrote:
> A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
> added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven
> days with no feedback, I was able to push it to stable.
Were there reports of the existing build cau
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:06 -0700, Eric Smith wrote:
> A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
> added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven days
> with no feedback, I was able to push it to stable.
>
> For an FTBFS for a new Fedora release, do
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700, Eric Smith wrote:
> For an FTBFS for a new Fedora release, does it really make sense to have
> the seven day delay? I don't see what the downside would be of allowing
> it to be pushed to stable immediately. Even if there's something wrong
> with the update, i
10 matches
Mail list logo
