Thank you Marek for coordinating the change!
Zdenek
On 8/22/24 20:56, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've finished the rebuild for Fedora 41 and rebuilt all the packages
again for rawhide since there were several packages which have been
updated in the meantime.
Thank you all for your help
Marek
Jan Grulich wrote:
> The reason for this is that qt5-qtwebengine copies over re2 header files,
> but that doesn't mean it links against the system version, it still uses
> the bundled one anyway.
The way it was SUPPOSED to work was that the header hack was supposed to be
applied together with an
Hi,
I've finished the rebuild for Fedora 41 and rebuilt all the packages
again for rawhide since there were several packages which have been
updated in the meantime.
Thank you all for your help
Marek
On 8/20/24 16:36, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
On 8/20/24 13:44, Jan Grulich wrote:
Hi,
út 20.
Hi,
On 8/20/24 13:44, Jan Grulich wrote:
Hi,
út 20. 8. 2024 v 12:30 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
napsal:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
unannounced soname b
Hi,
út 20. 8. 2024 v 12:30 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
napsal:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
> > unannounced soname bump of re2. qt5-qtw
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
>
> Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
> unannounced soname bump of re2. qt5-qtwebengine needs to be rebuilt due
> to that but it fails. I watch the
> https://sr
Thank you for fixing Inkscape!
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, August 19th, 2024 at 9:31 AM, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'v
Hi,
I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
unannounced soname bump of re2. qt5-qtwebengine needs to be rebuilt due
to that but it fails. I watch the
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine/pull-request/18#request
Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
> libreoffice is done.
> inkscape, sadly, uses the unstable API and fails:
> In file included from /usr/include/poppler/Object.h:44,
> from /usr/include/poppler/GfxState.h:41,
> from /usr/include/poppler/Gfx.h:40,
> from
> /buil
libreoffice is done.
inkscape, sadly, uses the unstable API and fails:
In file included from /usr/include/poppler/Object.h:44,
from /usr/include/poppler/GfxState.h:41,
from /usr/include/poppler/Gfx.h:40,
from
/builddir/build/BUILD/inkscape-1.3.2-
efl should be fixed in rawhide now.
~spot
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:32 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> Am Mi., 31. Jan. 2024 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik >:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
> > >> Hi,
> >
Am Mi., 31. Jan. 2024 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik :
>
> Hi,
>
> On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
> >> probably released this week and I would
Hi,
On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
the branching together with rebuilds of dependent
I'm looking in to efl FTBFS. It seems to be issues on s390x and ppc64le
related to more strict requirements, checks in gcc 14. I'm investigating them
now and if I will not be able to fix them promptly I will submit a PR with a
workaround( at first look disable altivec on ppc64le and for s390x s
Sandro wrote on 2024/01/30 22:02:
On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
the branching tog
Also, at least efl is FTBFS now, so it can't be rebuilt, and you'll have to
make a poppler-compat package before merging this, if efl isn't fixed by
then.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:03 PM Sandro wrote:
> On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 1
On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
the branching together with rebuilds of dependent pa
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
> probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
> the branching together with rebuilds of dependent packages.
>
> I'll prepare the build
> Packages which need to be rebuilt:
> calligra
> gambas3
> gdal
> gdcm
> inkscape
> kf5-kitinerary
> libreoffice
> pdf2djvu
> scribus
Poppler update almost always results in rebuilding TeXLive (due to pdfTeX) too.
I was wondering how the ‘bootstrap’ build is done when that happ
On 8/1/22 18:13, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release
usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now.
Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here. I
plan to merge the side tag with buildroot n
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 18:13 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release
> usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now.
> Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here.
> libreoffice
Th
Marek Kasik wrote:
> I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release
> usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now.
> Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here. I
> plan to merge the side tag with buildroot next week before bra
Hi,
On 7/26/21 10:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 18:06, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag
"f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in
it and I will ask to merge it to main br
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 18:06:28 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag
> "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in
> it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August).
>
> There are
cups-filters's been rebuilt in side tag as cups-filters-1.28.9-5.fc35.
I removed the build requirement for poppler-devel, since it is no longer
needed (all stuff is now covered by poppler-cpp-devel).
On 7/26/21 6:06 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the
On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 18:06, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag
> "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in
> it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August).
Shouldn't you wait for
Marek Kasik wrote:
> Thanks for pointing me to this fork, I was not aware of it. I've
> prepared my own pull request already:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/diffpdf/pull-request/1
>
> Looking at it now, it seems that CI failed for it. I'm going to have a
> look at that.
You probably don't h
On 1/11/21 9:31 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Marek Kasik wrote:
I've also removed the Qt4 frontend which we've maintained for
compatibility. Relevant package maintainers were contacted and some of
them already switched to Qt5.
For diffpdf, it looks like it needs to be upgraded to this for
Hi,
On 1/11/21 6:44 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag
"f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it
and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January).
Let me know if you won't have time for t
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 18:44:47 +0100, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Marek,
> I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag
> "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and
> I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January).
> Let me know
Marek Kasik wrote:
> I've also removed the Qt4 frontend which we've maintained for
> compatibility. Relevant package maintainers were contacted and some of
> them already switched to Qt5.
For diffpdf, it looks like it needs to be upgraded to this fork:
https://gitlab.com/eang/diffpdf
(The origina
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build
still fails:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log
Looks like you're still using sip4? /usr/bin/sip is sip4. sip5 is
/usr/bin/sip5.
I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build
still fails:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only lo
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and
sip5 seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve
this?
What do you mean by "sip5 seems to lack python bindings?"
Scott
__
python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and sip5
seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve this?
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Se
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:45 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag
> "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it
> and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January).
> Let me know if you won
Il giorno mar 14 ago 2018 alle 2:31, Marek Kasik ha
scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and
have backport
On 21.8.2018 02:01, Amit Saha wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:19 PM Christian Dersch
mailto:lupinix.fed...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik
mailto:mka...@redhat.com>>:
On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:19 PM Christian Dersch
wrote:
> Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik >:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhi
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 11:17 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
>
> Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with
> some
> security fixes. Not su
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with some
security fixes. Not sure if the API changed or anything like that as
their changelog is pretty terse
On 14.8.2018 14:53, Marek Kasik wrote:
On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik :
>
>
> On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
> >>
> >> There are several API changes and s
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:53 AM Marek Kasik wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
> >>
> >> There are several API changes and soname
On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
I've checked all packages which depend o
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
>
> There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
> libpoppler.so.*.
>
> I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have
> backport
Looks like LibreOffice is still broken in rawhide...
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.45.0 next week.
>
> There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
> libpoppler.so.*.
>
> I've prepared a scratch
On 08/08/2013 05:12 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.24.0 at 19th of August.
> There are several changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.37 to
> libpoppler.so.43). It also adds support for Qt5.
If you already have everything prepared, perhaps it's worth do
Le Mer 27 juin 2012 10:02, Marek Kasik a écrit :
> On 06/23/2012 11:15 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
>>> week.
>>> There are several API changes (new functio
On 06/23/2012 11:15 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
>> week.
>> There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
>> function to public section) an
Le Sam 23 juin 2012 21:53, Rex Dieter a écrit :
> OK, got it fixed now,
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=327259
Many thanks!
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>>
>> Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
>>> week.
>>> There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
>>> function to public sec
Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
> week.
> There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
> function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.25 to
> libpoppler.so.26).
>
> Regards
>
> Marek
> ___
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
>> week.
>> There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
>> function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpop
Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
> week.
> There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
> function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.25 to
> libpoppler.so.26).
On 12/01/2010 05:10 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
> You can test it against your package with this scratch-build:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2552287
It should be http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636922
Marek
___
dev
56 matches
Mail list logo
