On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Richard Z wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:14:03PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> 17.04.2015 07:41, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
>> > On 04/17/2015 01:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> 14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
>> >>> On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:14:03PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> 17.04.2015 07:41, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
> > On 04/17/2015 01:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> 14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
> >>> On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
> >>>
> Ralf, plowshare is a comm
17.04.2015 07:41, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
> On 04/17/2015 01:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> 14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
>>> On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
>>>
Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the
most popular file-sharing web
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 06:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> > As was mentioned
> > early many software do the same.
> In Fedora? None that I am aware of, except of Mozilla,
We ship pip and rubygems, I believe.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XM
Yes, I decided to package the modules and update the package whenever
possible.
Thank you!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:01:28PM -0300, Elder Marco wrote:
>
> Jason, thanks! I could package the modules. But this is not a good ideia as
> explained above. The package will be quickly outdated. Perharps, before I
> mark it as stable. However, if necessary, I will submit a review request to
> a
On 04/17/2015 01:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hi
14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the
most popular file-sharing websites. Each module (written in bash)
corresponds to a differen
On 04/17/2015 05:21 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/12/2015 09:01 PM, Elder Marco wrote:
Hello,
Since version 2.x.x. plowshare is not shipped with modules anymore.
There are two repositories. The main repository [1], with the core
pac
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/12/2015 09:01 PM, Elder Marco wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Since version 2.x.x. plowshare is not shipped with modules anymore.
>> There are two repositories. The main repository [1], with the core
>> package, and a new repository, with th
Hi
14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
> On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
>
>> Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the
>> most popular file-sharing websites. Each module (written in bash)
>> corresponds to a different sharing site. The modules are down
On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the
most popular file-sharing websites. Each module (written in bash)
corresponds to a different sharing site. The modules are downloaded via
plowmod, from a oficial repository provided
Thanks!
cicku, good idea!
Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most
popular file-sharing websites. Each module (written in bash) corresponds
to a different sharing site. The modules are downloaded via plowmod, from
a oficial repository provided by upstream. But
> "EM" == Elder Marco writes:
EM> So, upstream recommends to deal with "plowshare" core only, which it
EM> is quite stable. And I agree.
Well, look at how clamav does it. The package provides a snapshot of
the virus data so that we can ship _something_. This will be updated
when freshclam
On 04/12/2015 09:01 PM, Elder Marco wrote:
Hello,
Since version 2.x.x. plowshare is not shipped with modules anymore.
There are two repositories. The main repository [1], with the core
package, and a new repository, with the modules [2].
I have never used plowshare nor do I know what it is use
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
> So, the question is: Am I violating Fedora Packaging Guidelines if I do not
> provide the modules into fedora repositories?
Maybe this can be written into release notes? Since many users may
want to figure out the difference.
Yours sincerely,
15 matches
Mail list logo
