On 03/29/2016 11:13 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 27 March 2016 at 05:55, gil wrote:
>> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
>
> If you're not getting many replies it's because gmail is auto-marking
> all your emails as spam: "Why is this message in Spam?
On 27 March 2016 at 05:55, gil wrote:
> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
If you're not getting many replies it's because gmail is auto-marking
all your emails as spam: "Why is this message in Spam? It has a from
address in libero.it but has failed liber
On 03/27/2016 12:55 AM, gil wrote:
> hi
> can you take this for me
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 ?
> thanks in advance
> .g
>
Taken.
Thanks.
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
hi
can you take this for me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 ?
thanks in advance
.g
Il 27/03/2016 05:58, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
Hello all,
I have a compat package that I would like to get reviewed.
Here is the link to the review -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
Hi Christiopher,
Thank you for your reply.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Christopher Meng
wrote:
>
>> I think you should do a self introduction here first per guideline for
> newcomers.
>
Done, thank you for reminding.
>
> PS last year I gave a try on docx, its functionality was still patchy
>
>
> I think you should do a self introduction here first per guideline for
newcomers.
PS last year I gave a try on docx, its functionality was still patchy at
best.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On 03/06/2012 09:07 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 03/06/2012 03:11 AM, Vijay N. Majagaonkar wrote:
Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the
situation happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will
have much bigger problems than running sed on all .spec files.
I am sorr
On 03/06/2012 03:11 AM, Vijay N. Majagaonkar wrote:
Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the
situation happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will
have much bigger problems than running sed on all .spec files.
I am sorry but this will hit even if you d
> Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the situation
> happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will have much bigger
> problems than running sed on all .spec files.
I am sorry but this will hit even if you don't use macro when tools are not
in $PATH, unless you use fu
>> mkdir -p
>>cp -p ...
It will be good if you make use of macro like %{__cp}
Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the situation
happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will have much bigger
problems than running sed on all .spec files. Use just plain Unix
com
I am not reviewer but I think it make sense following things are good
to incorporate
>># These packages are not require for python >=2.6 but required for python
= 2.5
>>Requires: python >= 2.5
I think your Requires: must be python = 2.5
>>%setup -q -n cloud-%version
is that version shoul
I also need a sponsor. Sorry, forgot to mention that.
Upstream updated, so I updated the SRPM and spec files and added those
to the review request.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Krizek"
> To: t...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 2:19:20 PM
> Subject: Package review request - yourls
> Hello all,
>
> I packaged yourls (http://yourls.org/), a url shortening service that
> c
13 matches
Mail list logo
