Am 23.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Radek Holy:
So, to fix it, the "Requires:" should be e.g. "/usr/bin/python".
See also
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Guidelines&oldid=413629#Effect_of_the_UsrMove_Fedora_Feature
that's a nice writing BUT Fedora decided later to make thes
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: ndbeck...@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:47:10 PM
> Subject: Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)
>
>
>
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Šimáček"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , ndbeck...@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 3:58:49 PM
> Subject: Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)
>
> On 2015-06-2
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.06.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Josh Boyer:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček:
DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path:
Am 23.06.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček:
DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223478
Priority "Low" - seriously?
It is
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček:
>>
>> DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223478
>
>
> Priority "Low" - seriously?
It is probably worth pointing out that th
Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček:
DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223478
Priority "Low" - seriously?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On 2015-06-23 13:21, Neal Becker wrote:
I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push.
Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got:
sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1*
[sudo] password for nbecker:
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago on Tue J
On 23 June 2015 at 12:21, Neal Becker wrote:
> Also, can someone please confirm that I correctly took care of
> obsoleting the mercurial-emacs{-el} as per:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs
Thanks for doing this. I checked the spec file, and the
obsoletes/provides look correct. H
On 23.6.2015 13:21, Neal Becker wrote:
> I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push.
>
> Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got:
> sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1*
> [sudo] password for nbecker:
> Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago
Am 23.06.2015 um 13:21 schrieb Neal Becker:
I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push.
Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got:
sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1*
[sudo] password for nbecker:
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago on
11 matches
Mail list logo
