On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 05:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >
> >> Any idea how to fix this? We should probably add a section to the
> >> packaging guidelines, on how to migrate to noarch subpackages without
> >> brea
On 06/09/2010 10:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Good luck going through the hundreds of thousands of options of our hundreds
> of packages and listing all the ones we don't support for whatever reason. By
> the time such a list would be completed, it'd already be decades out of date
> and thus com
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Since neither of you speak for any of the yum developers, please stop
> doing so either implicitly or explicitly.
I'm not speaking for any of the yum developers. I'm just suggesting we,
Fedora, stop caring about bizarre yum options which we don't de
On 06/09/2010 10:23 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> a suggestion.
>
> Since neither of you speak for any of the yum developers, please stop
> doing so either implicitly or explicitly.
I am not speaking for you any yum developers implicitly or explicitly.
I am expressing a view point. You can as a yum d
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I don't buy your argument and trashing anyone's opinion you disagree
> with you as "crap" and "nonsense" is hardly going to help make your
> case. Excluding a dependency and setting a multi_lib option is hardly
> the same thing. Anyway, I am pr
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> I don't buy your argument and trashing anyone's opinion you disagree
> with you as "crap" and "nonsense" is hardly going to help make your
> case. Excluding a dependency and setting a multi_lib option is hardly
> the same thing. Anyway, I am pret
On 06/09/2010 10:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> A lot of software we ship supports more than just Fedora, you just can't
> expect all options to work on Fedora.
>
> As for yum in particular, there are plenty of ways to end up with a broken
> setup by modifying yum.conf, e.g. exclude=kdelibs will de
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 09:58 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Nonsense. There are plenty of options in software we ship which we don't
> > and can't support.
>
> Then stop including such a option or mark it unsupported or experimental.
A lot of software we shi
On 06/09/2010 09:58 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> As long as yum offers it as a option, bugs must be fixed.
>>
> Nonsense. There are plenty of options in software we ship which we don't and
> can't support.
>
Then stop including such a
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> As long as yum offers it as a option, bugs must be fixed.
Nonsense. There are plenty of options in software we ship which we don't and
can't support.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On 06/09/2010 05:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>> Any idea how to fix this? We should probably add a section to the
>> packaging guidelines, on how to migrate to noarch subpackages without
>> breaking upgrade paths.
>>
> Or just not support users who have unne
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Any idea how to fix this? We should probably add a section to the
> packaging guidelines, on how to migrate to noarch subpackages without
> breaking upgrade paths.
Or just not support users who have unneeded multilib packages installed.
Installing only those multil
12 matches
Mail list logo
