Re: libcacard can never be installed

2013-02-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 29/01/2013 10:03, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:57:11AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >> wrote: >>> I have a filed a bug about this: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345 >>> "libcacard can

Re: libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

2013-01-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:03:42 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > It looks as if the qemu source contains the one canonical copy of > libcacard. The separate 'libcacard' package has the following sources > file: > > $ cat sources > 189bc5b87281a72f8c72a0f7ebaa6d00 qemu-1.2.1.tar.bz2 > > So prob

Re: libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

2013-01-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:57:11AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I have a filed a bug about this: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345 > > "libcacard can never be installed" > > Is there a reason that qemu ships

Re: libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

2013-01-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I have a filed a bug about this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345 > "libcacard can never be installed" Is there a reason that qemu ships a bundled version of libcacard? What's the difference between the two of them