Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-06 Thread Jiri Vanek
Each bugs virtually blocks: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024265 Plain text: https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/massRebuild/results.txt On 2/6/22 17:36, Jiri Vanek wrote: Hello! Mass rebuild is finished, ftbfs are filled. Just 65. Some three may b

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-06 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello! Mass rebuild is finished, ftbfs are filled. Just 65. Some three may be false negatives. And some 50 are old source/target...usually 6, minimal is 7... Volunteers to fix welcomemd ;) I had already commented each bug. Please merge the f36-java17 to main rawhide so it no longer blocks f36

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-05 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello! We have managed to fix jdk11 and 17 yesterday evening. It is now building for rawhide. Oce it get fixed, I had merged the jdk11 no longer being system jdk, and jdk17 becoming system jdk for rawhid. They are now building for f36-java17 sidetag. They should finish today, and no later th

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-04 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 2/3/22 17:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote: Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it? I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution. I'm failing to judge all c

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote: > >> > >> Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it? > > > > I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution. > > I'm failing to judge all consequences. > > There are

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-03 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 2/3/22 16:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 03. 02. 22 16:06, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: Hello Fesco As the branching of f36 get close, java had to fall to troubles. After the last GCC mass rebuild, jdk11 is no longer buildable on i686. We had a pat

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

2022-02-03 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote: Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it? I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution. I'm failing to judge all consequences. There are some obstacles. It might not be just gcc that needs tagging in. It's proba