On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:45:30AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I don't think working software (even if not perfect, but what software is?)
> should be dropped from the distribution like that, ESPECIALLY for software
> like this that involves user data (programs in this case). You should at
> le
On 29 January 2016 at 18:51, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming
> language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not
> 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is
> based on Adobe Air -- and hop
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:26:13AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I still use this program. And it has no glitches on 32 arch. Until there is
> new open source version of Scratch or
> someone package Snap! (and add there some costumes and backgrounds) then the
> Scratch is still the best tool.
>
Dne 29.1.2016 v 19:51 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> I'd like to let go of ownership of the package, and unless someone else
> really wants to invest time into it, I think retiring it completely is
> the way to go.
I still use this program. And it has no glitches on 32 arch. Until there is new
open
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:51 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual
> programming
> language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's
> not
> 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is
> based on Adobe Air -
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming
> language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not
> 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is
> based on Adobe Air -- and hopefully _soon_ HTML5).
>
> I'd
Il 30/Gen/2016 15:54, "Matthew Miller" ha
scritto:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:45:20AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming
> > > language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not
> > > 64 bit clean) and
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:45:20AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming
> > language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not
> > 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is
> > based o
Il 29/Gen/2016 19:51, "Matthew Miller" ha
scritto:
>
> Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming
> language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not
> 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is
> based on Adobe Air -- and h
