Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

2013-04-06 Thread Ben Boeckel
[Sorry for the late reply; catching up on old bookmarked posts.] On Thu, 07 Mar, 2013 at 03:26:15 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote: > To avoid going through the whole discussion we had last week _again_ - > as fedpkg is primarily a tool intended for and used by Fedora packagers, > it defaults to tryin

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

2013-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On 06/03/13 08:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I just tried fedpkg and failed duo to permissions, so I just want to mention that you can get the SRPM from koji at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=386408 /Palle Try fedpkg clone --anonymous net-snmp To avoid going through

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

2013-03-06 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2013 11:07 AM, Palle Ravn wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher > mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > That said, for applying a patch to the source locally, you > probably want to install the 'fedora-packager' pack

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

2013-03-06 Thread Palle Ravn
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > That said, for applying a patch to the source locally, you probably > want to install the 'fedora-packager' package and then clone the > net-snmp build tree. > > fedpkg clone net-snmp > > Then you can modify the spec file in that directo

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

2013-03-06 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 06 Mar 2013 09:02:36 AM EST, Fulko Hew wrote: > I need some help/guidance on how to re-build a (normally) > distributed package (net-snmp) using the latest Fedora spec file, > but using the latest (upstream git head) version of the source; or >