On 09/22/2011 04:31 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 09/22/2011 09:09 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
>> Grubby will continue to support the grub 1 style config file.
>
> Just to confirm ...
>
> Does this mean that a RHEL 6/Fedora dual-boot system using grub 1 will
> continue to work (i.e. Fedora kernel updates
On 09/22/2011 09:09 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> Grubby will continue to support the grub 1 style config file.
Just to confirm ...
Does this mean that a RHEL 6/Fedora dual-boot system using grub 1 will
continue to work (i.e. Fedora kernel updates will properly update the
grub 1 configuration)?
--
=
On 09/22/2011 12:05 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Given the grub1/grub2 discussion that is going on, I could use some info
> about the state of grubby's support for grub1. The virtual machine
> images that the Cloud SIG publishes on Amazon EC2 do not require
> bootloaders, but they do require
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:58:53AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> (In short, pvgrub! I thought that was dead and buried a long time ago ..)
Of course I'm confusing this with PyGrub, that was the old horrible
thing. PvGrub is the shiny new thing.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Grou
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:05:19PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Given the grub1/grub2 discussion that is going on, I could use some info
> about the state of grubby's support for grub1. The virtual machine
> images that the Cloud SIG publishes on Amazon EC2 do not require
> bootloaders, bu
