On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:53:44AM +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> I may understand the need.
> But what about "server" ?
> If you install a webapp which use gettext, the locale will be set
> according to the conneected user (ex Horde)
> Does that mean that such webapp should requires "qlibc-all-langpa
Le 26/02/2016 10:47, Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf.
I may understand the need.
But what abou
On 03/05/2016 07:13 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 23:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yeah, I think the best approach wou
On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 23:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Yeah, I think the best approach would be to have all the langpacks offer a
> >> virtual Provides:
On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Bug 1238406 - Glibc locale subpackaging
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238406
>
> Changes/Glibc locale subpackaging
> https://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Glibc_locale_subpackaging
With glibc-2.23.90-3.fc25 and glibc-2.23.1-5.fc2
Excerpts from Carlos O'Donell's message of 2016-02-29 11:04 -05:00:
> On 02/29/2016 06:32 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Mock (or rpmbuild?) sets LANG to en_US.UTF-8 instead of C in order
> > to
> > have UTF-8 locale when building packages because it was decided that
> > UTF-8 is the default (build) en
Upgrading to this version of glibc also breaks postgres if you have a
database that uses something other than the C locale. Installing appropriate
language packs and restarting fix the issue.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lis
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 11:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 19:18 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > On 02/29/2016 05:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > IIRC it would simply terminate claiming the remote host had dropped the
> > > connection. There wasn'
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 19:18 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 05:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > IIRC it would simply terminate claiming the remote host had dropped the
> > connection. There wasn't any useful information even with -. I just
> > kinda guessed it must have so
On 02/29/2016 01:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 05:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> IIRC it would simply terminate claiming the remote host had dropped the
>> connection. There wasn't any useful information even with -. I just
>> kinda guessed it must have something to do with
On 02/29/2016 05:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> IIRC it would simply terminate claiming the remote host had dropped the
> connection. There wasn't any useful information even with -. I just
> kinda guessed it must have something to do with the langpacks,
> installed glibc-langpack-en, and it
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 11:10 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 08:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > >
> > > The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> > > language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>
Dne 29.2.2016 v 17:12 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> On 02/29/2016 04:22 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
>>> On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
I assume that I should
On 02/29/2016 04:22 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
>> On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
>>>
>>> I assume that I should do:
>>>
>>> # dnf install langpacks-cs
>>>
>>> to have
On 02/29/2016 10:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:42:57PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:57:27PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>> And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
>>> to install glibc-langpack-en.
On 02/27/2016 08:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
>> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
>> for transparent install
On 02/27/2016 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
>> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
>> for transparent install
On 02/29/2016 06:32 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-02-27, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
>> I'm now seeing this in mock / koji builds:
>>
>> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
>> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
>> LANGUAGE = (unset),
>> LC_ALL = (unset),
>> LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
>>
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 09:03 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 10:39 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:42:57PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:57:27PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
> > to install glibc-langpack-en.
>
> libvirtd also fails to start up:
>
> https://
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:57:27PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
> to install glibc-langpack-en.
libvirtd also fails to start up:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312688
I'm investigating it now.
Rich.
--
On 2016-02-27, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> I'm now seeing this in mock / koji builds:
>
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> LANGUAGE = (unset),
> LC_ALL = (unset),
> LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> are supported and installed on your system.
> p
Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
>>
>> I assume that I should do:
>>
>> # dnf install langpacks-cs
>>
>> to have only czech language available and English should be ava
> On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Yeah, I think the best approach would be to have all the langpacks offer a
>> virtual Provides: glibc-langpack and have the main package Requires:
>> glibc-langpack and S
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Yeah, I think the best approach would be to have all the langpacks offer a
> virtual Provides: glibc-langpack and have the main package Requires:
> glibc-langpack and Suggests: glibc-all-langpacks.
This would force the installati
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 20:57 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
> to install glibc-langpack-en.
Different case. The issue of how to handle upgrade of existing installs
is already being discussed upthread. I was pointing out a dif
And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
to install glibc-langpack-en.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016, 9:44 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> > language packs. We
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size
On 02/26/2016 10:38 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:06 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> Correct, 'glibc-all-langpacks' will solve the problem immediately.
>
> OK, I've added this to comps, to take care of new installs. If anyone
> implements support for language pack instal
On 02/26/2016 10:39 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
No languages are available by default, we did this because other
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 13:25, Parag Nemade wrote:
>> Please have a look at New Langpacks Change[1] information.
>
> Thanks for the information -- this looks a lot better than the current
> logic and so a huge thanks for driving this. O
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> >> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise
> >> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't rem
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:06 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Correct, 'glibc-all-langpacks' will solve the problem immediately.
OK, I've added this to comps, to take care of new installs. If anyone
implements support for language pack installation in both gnome-
initial-setup and gnome-control-cent
On 26 February 2016 at 13:25, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Please have a look at New Langpacks Change[1] information.
Thanks for the information -- this looks a lot better than the current
logic and so a huge thanks for driving this. One more question: Would
you be against me adding (translated) metainf
On 02/26/2016 09:44 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 12:25 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
>> to support users using just the graphical tools, and we can't rely on
>> command line tools for this kind of thing.
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 12:25 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
> to support users using just the graphical tools, and we can't rely on
> command line tools for this kind of thing. I'm happy to add support
> for installing lang packs
On 02/26/2016 07:33 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
>>> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>>> in glibc, and those
On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
>> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise
>> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't remove.
>
> For this reasons we have weak dependencies. I guess that:
> Rec
Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise
> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't remove.
For this reasons we have weak dependencies. I guess that:
Recommends: glibc-all-langpacks
can do the work (install or
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 09:47, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> We have over 180 supported languages
>> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
>> for transparent install and support via dnf.
>
> What happens if the user isn
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
>> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
>> for transparent inst
> What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
> to support users using just the graphical tools, and we can't rely on
> command line tools for this kind of thing. I'm happy to add support
> for installing lang packs into gnome-software but need to know how the
> langpack p
On 26 February 2016 at 09:47, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf.
What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
to support users using just the gra
On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size of a glibc
On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
>
> I assume that I should do:
>
> # dnf install langpacks-cs
>
> to have only czech language available and English should be available by
> default, right?
No languages are available
You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
I assume that I should do:
# dnf install langpacks-cs
to have only czech language available and English should be available by
default, right?
Vít
Dne 26.2.2016 v 10:47 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide
48 matches
Mail list logo
