Re: get compiz back in official repository

2012-06-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > Well those are two reasons. The more important third reason is that > no-one wants to maintain compiz. I don't want to, and drago01 doesn't > want to any more, that's why he orphaned it. Whether it's 0.8 or 0.9, we > just don't want to spend the time on it. If you want to,

Re: get compiz back in official repository

2012-06-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 15:12 +0430, Bersam K wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some conflicts with > boost-serialization. and of cource new compiz (0.9.x) are really > buggy! show blank screen when you use Desktop Cube and some other > really bad bugs. Well those

Re: get compiz back in official repository

2012-06-22 Thread Nelson Marques
Actually the 0.8 tree is still the stable tree... the 0.9.x (glib mainloop) is the unstable one, and yes it is a nightmare and somehow unpredictable. It's a nice thing to see 0.8.x returning :) 2012/6/22 Bersam K : > Hi Everybody, > > In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some conflicts with >