Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 12/02/19 10:55 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:49:23AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On that basis, why does gcc-c++ install libgomp and libgfortran? I think gcc-c++ doesn't require libgfortran, gcc-gfortran does. Ah yes, sorry. I ran 'mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64

Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:49:23AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On that basis, why does gcc-c++ install libgomp and libgfortran? I think gcc-c++ doesn't require libgfortran, gcc-gfortran does. The reason to have libgomp in the dependencies was that it is a library that isn't explicitly used on

Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 11/02/19 12:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: > On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install >>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is n

Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 11/02/19 12:14 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: Hi, I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ package. My program fails, because it can

Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-11 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jonathan Wakely: > > > On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install > >>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ > >>

Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jonathan Wakely: > On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install >>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ >>package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is >>this

Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: Hi, I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is this the supposed behavior to install