Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-05-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 26.04.2012 11:18, schrieb Adam Williamson: > >> Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld > >> to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall > >> static, with my current iptab

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-05-02 Thread Jiri Popelka
I've updated the feature page. -- Jiri On 04/30/2012 10:24 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote: Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall static, with my current iptables script. Once we actually go

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-30 Thread Kévin Raymond
> > > > Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld > > to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall > > static, with my current iptables script. > > Once we actually go to firewalld by default, then yes, at least as long > as lokkit and

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-26 Thread Dariusz J. Garbowski
On 26/04/12 03:18 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 17:27 -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall static, with my current iptables script

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 26.04.2012 11:18, schrieb Adam Williamson: >> Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld >> to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall >> static, with my current iptables script. > > Once we actually go to firewalld by default, the

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 17:27 -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: > On 25/04/12 10:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:30 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > >> Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're > >> using Fedora in production, I presume you're ins

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-26 Thread Chris Murphy
Is anyone else seeing on F17 TC1 startup a systemd message that iptables failed? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-25 Thread Dariusz J. Garbowski
On 25/04/12 10:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:30 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with Kickstart. It's worth noting that if the question is how does fi

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:30 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're > using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with > Kickstart. It's worth noting that if the question is how does firewalld handle upgrades, I think it may b

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 24.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >> Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed.  If you're >> using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with >> Kickstart.  You can set up anything you like in Kickstart,

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Jon Ciesla: > Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're > using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with > Kickstart. You can set up anything you like in Kickstart, including > not using firewalld if you so desire. thank you

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 24.04.2012 02:08, schrieb Oron Peled: >> Looks like this transition (as is currently planned) is going to >> break many setups. I want to show the three following use-cases >> which may be severely broken by this transition. > > exactly th

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.04.2012 02:08, schrieb Oron Peled: > Looks like this transition (as is currently planned) is going to > break many setups. I want to show the three following use-cases > which may be severely broken by this transition. exactly this is the problem i have attached my ip-tables script making a

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-23 Thread Oron Peled
On Monday, 23 בApril 2012 18:56:23 Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 23.04.2012 17:32, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default > >> > >>> An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with droppin

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.04.2012 17:32, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default >> >>> An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with dropping support for >>> the >>> static firewall with system-config-fi

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-23 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Hi > > one question before decisions are nailed down > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default > >> An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with dropping support for >> the >> static firewall with system-config-