> On 8 Oct 2024, at 13:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Or `dnf remove rpm-plugin-ima`.
> It doesn't look like it's a hard dependency of anything vital.
This is what I did and that fixed it, as expected.
Barry
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:32 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:27 PM Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > At least for now, use rpm "--noplugins" option to avoid writing the file
> > signatures.
>
> Or `dnf remove rpm-plugin-ima`.
> It doesn't look like it's a hard dependency of anyth
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:27 PM Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> At least for now, usse rpm "--noplugins" option to avoid writing the file
> signatures.
Or `dnf remove rpm-plugin-ima`.
It doesn't look like it's a hard dependency of anything vital.
Fabio
--
___
de
At least for now, usse rpm "--noplugins" option to avoid writing the file
signatures.
Mimi
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 12:14 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 10/6/24 12:42 AM, Barry wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > On the other hand, the error message you're seeing is from the IMA
> > > plugin. So I assume you've enabled rpm-plugin-ima?
>
On 10/6/24 12:42 AM, Barry wrote:
On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On the other hand, the error message you're seeing is from the IMA plugin. So I
assume you've enabled rpm-plugin-ima?
This a f39 aarch64 upgraded to f40 then f41 with no customisations.
(There are no f40 or
> On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On the other hand, the error message you're seeing is from the IMA plugin. So
> I assume you've enabled rpm-plugin-ima?
This a f39 aarch64 upgraded to f40 then f41 with no customisations.
(There are no f40 or f41 iso so i have to do this d
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 19:28:10 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 18:16 Barry Scott wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
> > And hit this issue.
> >
> > : 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
> > : [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
> >
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 18:16 Barry Scott wrote:
> I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
> And hit this issue.
>
> : 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
> : [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
> error: ima: could not apply signature on
> '/home/barry/rpmbuild.d/systemd
