TeamGit is a really nice gui to git
2010/6/19, Jarod Wilson :
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:08 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> > Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
>>>
>>> But it's a command-line tool. Cervi
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:08 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> > Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
>>
>> But it's a command-line tool. Cervisia (what I use on the CVS repos) is a
>> GUI.
>>
>> Kevin Kof
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:08 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
>
> But it's a command-line tool. Cervisia (what I use on the CVS repos) is a
> GUI.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
fedpkg is also a library, where all the interesting t
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
But it's a command-line tool. Cervisia (what I use on the CVS repos) is a
GUI.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Count me as not excited.
>
> As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong
> with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to
> one of the hardest to use SCM systems out there.
Linus can tell you everything that is wrong
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:59:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:05:38AM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> > I second that, unless there are some obvious advantages which I cannot
> > see. In case there are some it would be great if they get mentioned in
> > https://fedorapr
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 21:39 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> It's seems, that this feature is not implemented in the current
> fedora-packager package.
>
> when I try to make a fedpkg cloone --branches I will get only
> a message which describe the function for this command without
> any visible res
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 13:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Is the effort to make it easy to build RPM's directly from git tags
> related to this or is that a separate project?
That's a different project, and even then we will likely need to
construct a source tarball at some point in the proce
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:01:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 03:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> > it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> > time.
> >
> > Since my last upda
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating
> >> wrote:
> >> > The current url is
> >> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproje
Peter Robinson wrote, at 06/14/2010 05:58 PM +9:00:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/and that work
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > The current url is
>> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
>> > ssh://.
>>
>> Any chance of making
Christof Damian writes:
> One question though: will it be possible to create a git repository
> local for packages which are going through the review process (or even
> before that for private packages) and then push this to fedora once
> the review is approved?
You can probably just merge your
Jesse Keating writes:
> I hadn't planned on it. Is there really a need for this? Read only via
> http is do-able, but undesirable. Write via https is going to be a long
> shot.
Recent git supports the smart protocol over http/https, both for fetch
and push.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch.
Jesse Keating writes:
> (people with existing clones will have to blow them away and
> re-clone),
Doing git fetch and git reset --hard should be enough.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for somethin
On 06/11/2010 03:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> time.
>
> Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
> that will replace the
On Sunday, June 13, 2010 06:54:37 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
>
> Count me as not excited.
>
> As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously
> wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > The current url is
>> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
>> > ssh://.
>>
>> Any chance of making
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 23:57, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>
> Not necessary at all. The current url is
> pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
> ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like the
> current d
On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 17:26 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
> >> Or can regular git be used ?
> >>
> >>
> > Not necessary at all. Th
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > The current url is
> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
> > ssh://.
>
> Any chance of making that work with http:// and https:// (for pushes) too?
>
I ha
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:05:38AM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> I second that, unless there are some obvious advantages which I cannot
> see. In case there are some it would be great if they get mentioned in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Proposal
Linked from there:
Current Pain Poi
On 13 June 2010 22:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
>
> Count me as not excited.
>
> As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong
> with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switchi
Jesse Keating wrote:
> I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
Count me as not excited.
As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong
with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to
one of the hardest to use SCM systems out ther
Hi Jesse,
On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>
>> Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
>> Or can regular git be used ?
>>
>>
> Not necessary at all. The current url is
> pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
>
Am 11.06.2010 23:57, schrieb Jesse Keating:
> ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like the
> current directory layout where each release is a subdir, you can do
> 'fedpkg clone --branches' and you'll get that layout. You can also do
> fedpkg clone -b and get a checkout of t
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> The current url is
> pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
> ssh://.
Any chance of making that work with http:// and https:// (for pushes) too?
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
> Or can regular git be used ?
>
>
Not necessary at all. The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:09:41 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
> With dist-git it's slightly different:
>
> fedpkg clone
Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
Or can regular git be used ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 12:46 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> How will this affect current packagers' workflow? Will the changes necessary
> be documented on the wiki? It doesn't seem straight off the bat that this
> would be a drop-in replacement without packagers needing to tweak their
> workflow.
>
On Thu 10 June 2010 2:44:47 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> time.
>
> Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
> that will rep
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> time.
>
> Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
> that will r
32 matches
Mail list logo
