Re: depcheck appears to be broken

2015-08-27 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:05:35 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I think that is because dnf's repoquery sucks - I believe it is only > looking for specific requires of "libwps", And for some things it doesn't look at all: # dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64 # The developers prefer it to

Re: depcheck appears to be broken

2015-08-26 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:05:35 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/26/2015 05:04 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:34:14 -0600 > > Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 > >> > >>depchecklibwps-0.4.1-1.fc21(x86

Re: depcheck appears to be broken

2015-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 17:04 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > When I look into the specfile of libreoffice in the f21 branch, I > don't > actually see a Requires on libwps for fedora, just a BuildRequires: Shared library dependencies are auto-generated. They don't appear in the spec file. -- Adam Willi

Re: depcheck appears to be broken

2015-08-26 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 08/26/2015 05:04 PM, Tim Flink wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:34:14 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 depchecklibwps-0.4.1-1.fc21(x86_64) a day ago shows passed: TAP version 13 1..1 ok - depcheck for Koji b

Re: depcheck appears to be broken

2015-08-26 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:34:14 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 > > depchecklibwps-0.4.1-1.fc21(x86_64) a > day ago > > shows passed: > > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > ok - depcheck for Koji build libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 >