On 10/22/2013 07:53 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Well, I agree, there's more to it. Like cost. One could consider to
pair serveral HHD' each with a dedicated bcache SSD. And from that one
could build a RAID array. This RAID array has excellent (read)
performance because of the combined SSD performan
On 10/23/2013 04:01 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I believe that quote describes "what we'd like to do someday", not
"what it does now"?
You're right, it's about plans for the future.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora C
On 10/21/2013 06:47 PM, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote:
Interesting, then logic would suggest to (b)cache
the components of the RAID.
Of, even better, to (b)cache /dev/sd[ab] (in this
case) and cover, in this way, everything.
Well, I agree, there's more to it. Like cost. One could consider to pair
se
Op 10/20/13 8:59 PM schreef Piergiorgio Sartor
:
>Does the tools converts the complete RAID-10, including
>the LVM volumes to bcache?
I will look into the blocks tool for F21, but for now I leave answering
the question to Gabriel.
>
>Some times ago I asked, in my setup, what would be the
>right
Hi Reartes,
On 10/18/2013 05:57 PM, Reartes Guillermo wrote:
I tested F20 on a physical host with a vertex3 ssd.
But it was not a requested test case, i re-used a md raid0 with a 6gb
partition of the ssd.
The file-system was setup as a storage pool for virt-manager.
I did not experience any is
Hi,
I tested F20 on a physical host with a vertex3 ssd.
But it was not a requested test case, i re-used a md raid0 with a 6gb
partition of the ssd.
The file-system was setup as a storage pool for virt-manager.
I did not experience any issues, i installed 2 F20 guest at the same time.
I even rebo
> - Because it's hard to change an existing partition to a 'bcached'
> partition, it's not really tempting to test (there's a blocks utility
> under development that may help, currently backup-restore is the only way)
blocks[1] has been doing bcache conversion since forever (last march,
when the p
Hi,
On 10/18/2013 11:56 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Hi all,
We've been waiting to see if other people who couldn't make on Sunday
would also do some testing. That hasn't happened, so a few words on my
impressions on the test day are appropriate indeed.
First of all not many people really did some
Hi all,
We've been waiting to see if other people who couldn't make on Sunday
would also do some testing. That hasn't happened, so a few words on my
impressions on the test day are appropriate indeed.
First of all not many people really did some testing. We didn't expect
many people to participat
On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was brought to my attention that there's a confusing typo in the
> message below regarding the planning of bcache support for anaconda. The
> claim that it is planned for F20 is not true, it is planned for F21:
>
> https://fedorahost
Hi
It was brought to my attention that there's a confusing typo in the
message below regarding the planning of bcache support for anaconda. The
claim that it is planned for F20 is not true, it is planned for F21:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1145
Sorry for any confusion,
Rolf
Op 26-09
11 matches
Mail list logo
