Re: audacity

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:47:55PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia >> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy w

Re: audacity

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 19:55 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 > > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > >> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux > >> > environment". A lot of vendors have l

Re: audacity

Hi, On 04/29/2013 05:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. This is not true for at least Fedora, I've pingened the maintainer (David Timms) about the 2.0.3 update in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.red

Re: audacity

Hi, On 04/30/2013 10:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and 19. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest version. Thanks! Regards, Hans -- devel maili

Re: audacity

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote

Re: audacity

On Ter, 2013-04-30 at 18:18 -0500, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:35:12 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery > > > wrote: > > > For F18, it appears that the Auda

Re: audacity

udacity from SVN on Fedora 18 WITH mp3 support. Here is the entire email I received from the Audacity mailing list: > From: g...@audacityteam.org > To: Discussion list for Audacity users > Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] > Can't build Audacity from SVN on Fedora 18 Date: Mon, 01 Apr

Re: audacity

On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery > wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it > won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is > it possible to get this par

Re: audacity

On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to > get this particular build working? please move this question to rpmfusion Maling lists ...

Re: audacity

New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and 19. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest version. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: audacity

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:47:55PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > >>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 > >>> Nico Kadel-G

Re: audacity

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: >>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 >>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:50 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth < tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw > wrote: > > I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review > > request? > > Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won'

Re: audacity

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux >>> > environment". A lot of vendors have license

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review > request? Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won't have time to review it until Wednesday, so take your time. :-) BTW, it looks like Hans de Goede h

Re: audacity

On 04/29/2013 08:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request? Thanks, Richard Sure. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: audacity

On 04/30/2013 03:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working? What do you mean

Re: audacity

On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to > get this particular build working? What do you mean with Audacity mp3 build is broken , rpmf

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software > copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally > expiring, and the existing court cases have been oddm and usually > settled out of court. But the

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux >> > environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that >> > work on the linux. The point is that t

Re: audacity

On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux > > environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that > > work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open > > source mp3 en/decoder. > > Name

Re: audacity

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux >> environments. > > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux > environment". A lot of vendors have li

Re: audacity

I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: audacity

I still have it on my system and use it, what else is there to use? Thanks, Phillip Lynn On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. > > I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. > > > Nicolas (kwizart) > > > >

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. >> > > That's doesn't appear to be true. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity > > Now, if the maintai

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. > That's doesn't appear to be true. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to deal with that.

Re: audacity

audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. Nicolas (kwizart) 2013/4/28 Richard Vickery > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to

Re: audacity

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux > environments. This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point i

Re: audacity

Le dimanche 28 avril 2013 à 13:08 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : > There's also the Penguin Liberation Front for a few components with > weird licensing that others haven't been able to resolve usable > licenses for. PLF closed a few weeks ago[1], and was for Mandriva. [1] http://www.mail-

Re: audacity

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get > this particular build working? > > MP3 players, and the DVD

Re: audacity

Am 28.04.2013 16:50, schrieb Richard Vickery: > On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, "Frank Murphy" > wrote: >> >> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 >> Richard Vickery > > wrote: >> >> > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken

Re: audacity

Please report that to RPMFusion. Not here. As have said before, Fedora does not support mp3 files because is not free and some countries could be prohibed by law. Please contact with RPMfusion people. Greetings! El 28/04/2013 16:28, "Richard Shaw" escribió: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Ri

Re: audacity

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get > this particular build working? > I think what you're looking

Re: audacity

On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, "Frank Murphy" wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 > Richard Vickery wrote: > > > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible > > to get this particular build workin

Re: audacity

On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 Richard Vickery wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible > to get this particular build working? Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support

Re: Audacity - audio editor - test request

On 18/02/12 09:46, Richard Vickery wrote: Have you received an indication from anyone to do this? No, actually. Although I thought I sent it to the test list but see now I sent to devel. I would like to help test it; how am I to get it off the site using Google-Chrome? Looks like I built a s

Re: Audacity - audio editor - test request

Hi David: Have you received an indication from anyone to do this? I would like to help test it; how am I to get it off the site using Google-Chrome? On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:58 AM, David Timms wrote: > Hi, It appears Audacity is getting close to v2 release (it's been in 1.3 > beta mode for a fe