On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 11:02 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > People are working on taskotron ( successor of autoqa ) and this will
> > likely prevent this kind of issue in the future, I hope. If you feel
> > that's important to make sure this doesn't happen, they will always
> > accept any kind of help.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 10 janvier 2014 à 09:56 -0500, Chuck Anderson a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>> > > This appears to have also broken F
Le vendredi 10 janvier 2014 à 09:56 -0500, Chuck Anderson a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > > This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-testing, which is
> > > even less acceptable t
On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 00:49 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Chuck Anderson wrote, at 01/10/2014 11:56 PM +9:00:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> >>> This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-t
Chuck Anderson wrote, at 01/10/2014 11:56 PM +9:00:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-testing, which is
even less acceptable than breaking rawhide.
Eh, I'
Am 10.01.2014 15:56, schrieb Chuck Anderson:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>> This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-testing, which is
>>> even less acceptable than breaking rawhide.
>>
>>
