Le 04/12/2011 07:14, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
>> - open a bz ticket to create git access for libquvi-scripts and libquvi
>> in F16 (quvi already exists)
> Actually, the new branch request should be filed in the existing review
> ticket, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> - open a bz ticket to create git access for libquvi-scripts and libquvi
> in F16 (quvi already exists)
Actually, the new branch request should be filed in the existing review
ticket, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_fo
On 03/12/2011 23:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> At least postpone dealing with it until the anticipated problems (you
>> mentioned "problems will appear") become reality? If nothing's broken
>> at the moment, don't try to fix anything yet...
> I think there already are some fixes
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> At least postpone dealing with it until the anticipated problems (you
> mentioned "problems will appear") become reality? If nothing's broken
> at the moment, don't try to fix anything yet...
I think there already are some fixes of that kind, and I also don't see what
waiti
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> My question is : what must I do ? backport 0.4.x ? downgrade to 0.2.16 ?
> keep 0.2.19 ?
I'd go with backporting 0.4.x.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/03/2011 05:32 PM, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> So now, F15 and rawhide both have a maintained version, but F16 provides
> a quvi that is not maintained. Problems will appear because the websites
> handeled by libquvi often change.
[...]
> My question is : what must I do ? backport 0.4.x ? down
