Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > If I give negative karma, that's because I tested the update and > > found it didn't work. > > Why would you do that instead of retracting the update? Actually because I'd forgot you could do that. Yes

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Björn Persson
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If I give negative karma, that's because I tested the update and > found it didn't work. Why would you do that instead of retracting the update? Björn Persson -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Andre Robatino
Björn Persson xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> writes: > If Bodhi were to be designed for proxy karma it should allow the > maintainer unlimited karma points so that they could act as a proxy for > more than one user. Allowing one proxy karma point but not more than one > would be a quite arbitrary restrict

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:37 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 >> >> I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means >> my karma doesn't count

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Jones
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:37 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > my karma doesn't count ... > > IMO this change makes the karma system (even) wo

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Julian Leyh wrote: > If you submit it, it means you already tested and approved it. Karma > from you gives no new (quality) information about the package. It > should be tested by independent people. Not at all. I might not be able to test the update, eg.

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:17:59PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 20.8.2012 13:37, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > >I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > >my karma doesn't count

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Björn Persson
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Furthermore, a not-inconsequential consideration is proxy-karma. For > example, I have in the past occasionally given karma +1 (and -1) on my > own packages from users that did not have Fedora accounts (or couldn't > manage to defeat the ogre that is FAS's CAPTCHA). If B

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Julian Leyh
2012/8/20 Andre Robatino : > Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > >> >> 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: >> > >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 >> > >> > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means >> > my karma doesn'

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > > > > > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > > > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing > > > means > >

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:28 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > > > > > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > > > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Andre Robatino
Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > > my karma doesn't count ... > > > > IMO this change

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Julian Leyh
2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones : > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > my karma doesn't count ... > > IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before. > > Rich. If

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 20.8.2012 13:37, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means my karma doesn't count ... IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before. Ri