Just FTR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278196
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437884
Vít
Dne 04. 06. 19 v 15:28 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
> but not automatically re-installed on each update?
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
> but not automatically re-installed on each update?
The only workaround for that broken DNF behavior that packagers can in some
cases use at this time is to use boolean Supplements instead of a simple
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:36 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Does it sense to reopen bug 1699672, in light of this development?
>
> It would also make sense to get the upstream issue:
> https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/issues/168
> reopened.
>
That will not get reopened, be
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Does it sense to reopen bug 1699672, in light of this development?
It would also make sense to get the upstream issue:
https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/issues/168
reopened.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I would love to see "dnf mark" command to utilize for this. Something
> like: dnf mark soft-remove I.e. remove the package and does not install it
> again unless something pull it back using hard "Requires".
Why would we require explicit marking? There is no technical reaso
On 6/4/19 11:27 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
The option can also be set in dnf.conf (--setopt= maps to options that
you can set there.:) )
This is one option, but it hides them entirely. I would like an option that still
shows possible weak dependencies without installing them. Example:
--setopt=i
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 19:06 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adam Williamson:
>
> > As a side note, if your goal is "to maintain a minimal system
> > installation", perhaps what you might want is to be able to configure
> > dnf to simply *never* install weak (Recommends) or very weak (Suggests)
>
* Adam Williamson:
> As a side note, if your goal is "to maintain a minimal system
> installation", perhaps what you might want is to be able to configure
> dnf to simply *never* install weak (Recommends) or very weak (Suggests)
> dependencies. IIRC, this is configurable on SUSE - you can set this
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019, 18:03 Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 15:53 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > * Neal Gompa:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > > > Is there a form of weak depende
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019, 18:03 Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 15:53 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Neal Gompa:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:30 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> > > > Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
> > > > but not automatica
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 15:53 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
> > > but not automatically re-installed on each update?
> > >
> > > If all the optional
Dne 04. 06. 19 v 15:48 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> he's aware that it's possible and some work could be
> done to support this depending on demand for the feature.
I do demand this feature :)
I would love to see "dnf mark" command to utilize for this. Something like: dnf
mark soft-remove
I.e. remove
* Neal Gompa:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
>> but not automatically re-installed on each update?
>>
>> If all the optional components are back after an update, that means that
>> it's quite hard
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
> but not automatically re-installed on each update?
>
> If all the optional components are back after an update, that means that
> it's quite hard to maintain a minimal s
On 04. 06. 19 15:28, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
but not automatically re-installed on each update?
If all the optional components are back after an update, that means that
it's quite hard to maintain a minimal system installation.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019, 15:30 Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is there a form of weak dependency which is installed when available,
> but not automatically re-installed on each update?
>
> If all the optional components are back after an update, that means that
> it's quite hard to maintain a minimal system
16 matches
Mail list logo
