Re: Upgrades of Sundials and PETSc

2023-10-21 Thread Sandro
On 20-10-2023 15:52, Ben Beasley wrote: For next time, this seems to work for me: for p in petsc{,64,-openmpi,-mpich} libpetsc.so; do repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires "$p"; done | sort -u An alternative to above, using gotmax23's excellent fedrq [1], you'd get the same re

Re: Upgrades of Sundials and PETSc

2023-10-20 Thread Ben Beasley
Just a heads-up that whichever process you have been using to determine the list of affected dependent packages has been missing getdp; see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245240 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189695. I just rebuilt getdp in Rawhide, so there’s no