On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:18:02 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Just to make sure, I'll quote myself from my initial response:
>
> Dne 4.4.2017 v 08:05 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Please do these changes just in Rawhide.
And you think in Rawhide you are free to violate upgrade paths?
Breaking dependenc
Dne 5.4.2017 v 15:42 Remi Collet napsal(a):
> Le 03/04/2017 à 21:35, Christopher a écrit :
>> There seem to be a lot of possible guidance on the Wiki for what I'm trying
>> to do, but no clear, unambiguous step-by-step path to follow. So, I'm
>> seeking advice here.
>>
>> js-jquery provides jquer
Le 03/04/2017 à 21:35, Christopher a écrit :
> There seem to be a lot of possible guidance on the Wiki for what I'm trying
> to do, but no clear, unambiguous step-by-step path to follow. So, I'm
> seeking advice here.
>
> js-jquery provides jquery 2.x and js-jquery 2.x
> js-jquery1 provides jquery
Dne 5.4.2017 v 13:45 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:11:56 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Is this some special process for js-jquery?
> No.
>
>> It is quite common that package bumps its version or soname and breaks
>> something. We either fix the incompatibility or provide "c
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:11:56 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Is this some special process for js-jquery?
No.
> It is quite common that package bumps its version or soname and breaks
> something. We either fix the incompatibility or provide "compat" package.
>
> You can take recent update of openssl
Dne 5.4.2017 v 12:06 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:37:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
>>>
>>> because you want t
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:37:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
> >
> > because you want the new js-jquery2 package to replace the previous
> >
Dne 4.4.2017 v 18:17 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:48:44 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> It is not rename jquery is updated and introduced new jquery2
>> package. There is nothing to obsolete anywhere
> *sigh*
>
> It is exactly this,
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:48:44 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> It is not rename jquery is updated and introduced new jquery2
> package. There is nothing to obsolete anywhere
*sigh*
It is exactly this,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
It is not rename jquery is updated and introduced new jquery2
package. There is nothing to obsolete anywhere
Vít
Dne 4.4.2017 v 11:14 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:05:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Please do not obsolete anything. For rubygem-jquery-rails, I'd
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:05:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Please do not obsolete anything. For rubygem-jquery-rails, I'd like to
> use jQuery 1.x, 2.x as well as 3.x
It would only be a rename. It would not stop you from adding explicit
Requires to pull in all three js-jquery packages.
_
Dne 3.4.2017 v 21:35 Christopher napsal(a):
> There seem to be a lot of possible guidance on the Wiki for what I'm
> trying to do, but no clear, unambiguous step-by-step path to follow.
> So, I'm seeking advice here.
>
> js-jquery provides jquery 2.x and js-jquery 2.x
> js-jquery1 provides jquery
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:35:24 +, Christopher wrote:
> There seem to be a lot of possible guidance on the Wiki for what I'm trying
> to do, but no clear, unambiguous step-by-step path to follow. So, I'm
> seeking advice here.
>
> js-jquery provides jquery 2.x and js-jquery 2.x
> js-jquery1 prov
13 matches
Mail list logo
