The release 3.13.0-4 should be okay.
> On 09/04/20 02:37, David S wrote>
> I found an issue, where linking against petsc (mpi version) and hdf5
> (serial version), this causes an error with unresolved dependencies for
> libpetsc.so
> This is caused by petsc linking against the mpi hdf5, but I only
On 4/7/20 12:51 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 06/04/20 16:19, David Schwörer wrote:
On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
`MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
on Rawhide;
On 06/04/20 16:19, David Schwörer wrote:
> On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
>>> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
`MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
on Rawhide; these updates will
On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
>> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
>>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
>>>
>> [:snip
On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
>>
> [:snip:]
>
>
> Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I know
On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
`MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
[:snip:]
Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I know PETSc is quite challenging to
package.
I tried to
