Re: Unresponsive packager: nilskoenig

2025-03-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:46:32PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > We have been emailing daily the following user

Re: Unresponsive packager: nilskoenig

2025-03-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:46:32PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they > > have set in FAS does not correspond to a val

Re: Unresponsive packager: nilskoenig

2025-03-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they > have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. > This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. > > Does s