nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> I'm quite sure deploying a font that supports a newer unicode revision
> than the base system is ok. The various font utilises won't know to look
> for new glyphs and gucharmap won't show pretty name for those glyphs,
> that's all.
And not even necessarily all
Thanks Nicolas,
I just saw that F25 and later had got the Unicode 9 update, so I'll do
the same with this one. I will push it later today or on Friday, after
I have verified and amended the font coverage details.
Best regards,
Alex
___
devel mailing lis
Hi,
I'm quite sure deploying a font that supports a newer unicode revision than the
base system is ok. The various font utilises won't know to look for new glyphs
and gucharmap won't show pretty name for those glyphs, that's all.
That may cause some codepoints to be deprecated earlier than the
