On 2019-04-29 10:31 a.m., Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 29/04/2019 15:21, Jan Staněk wrote:
>
>> Only other option I can think of is going the Rust route (packages only
>> in rawhide, anything depending on them must be a module), which I'm not
>> a fan of.
>
> Module don't work for Node.js though.
>
> The
On 29/04/2019 15:21, Jan Staněk wrote:
Only other option I can think of is going the Rust route (packages only
in rawhide, anything depending on them must be a module), which I'm not
a fan of.
Module don't work for Node.js though.
They work for rust and go because of static linking, so differ
On 29. 04. 19 15:42, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> One of the frustrating things with NodeJS packaging in Fedora is that
> because of the crazy number of dependencies between NodeJS packages, a
> simple version bump in one package could cause a whole cascade of other
> packages that need to be updated to
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:49 AM Jan Staněk wrote:
> Hello,
> I have recently (last week) taken on maintenance of several to-be
> orphaned nodejs packages. Since the packages were not upgraded for a
> while, they are usually a major version behind the upstream release.
> I have started to remedy t
