On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:23:04PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 13:13 +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> >> > Let it be known that due to certain packaging c
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 13:13 +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
>> > Let it be known that due to certain packaging changes implemented
>> > in December, neither python nor python3 are aut
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 13:13 +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Let it be known that due to certain packaging changes implemented
> > in December, neither python nor python3 are automatically pulled
> > into the default, minimal buildroot a
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 13:13 +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> Let it be known that due to certain packaging changes implemented
> in December, neither python nor python3 are automatically pulled
> into the default, minimal buildroot anymore.
I have to note that for python3 it's not really true, since rpm