On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 17:46:51 +0100
Alec Leamas wrote:
> Using several wxWidgets version is indeed a bit painful, been there,
> done that. One quick fix is to configure alternatives to use the new
> 3.2 version version of wx-config instead of the default 3.0.
I'm not sure what alternatives is, bu
Hi Stan,
On 09/02/2023 16:55, stan via devel wrote:
I downloaded the wxWidgets code from their site, and compiled it using
their instructions on f37. Compiled easily, with only a warning about
missing midi support. I installed it in /usr/local
When I tried to get tenacity to use it, though,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:51:37 -0700
stan via devel wrote:
> lot of (any?) sound editing anymore. Just for the challenge. Maybe
> not. :-)
I see lots of other people have taken up the challenge, and reported
issues they found, but I thought I would update with my unsuccessful
results.
I download
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
> On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
>> wxGTK should have that...
>
> It should, and they fixed i
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
>
> > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> >> wxGTK should have that...
> >
> > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X
> series
> > as far as I can t
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
wxGTK should have that...
It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series
as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason
liblibnyquist.so i
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
wxGTK should have that...
It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X
series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some
reason liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue
with the
wxGTK should have that...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: h
On 2/8/23 10:59 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
stan via devel writes:
As they say in the BUILDING.md file,
though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the
configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out.
That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37
> stan via devel writes:
> As they say in the BUILDING.md file,
> though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the
> configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out.
That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37 has 3.2.1.
- J<
___
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:02:47 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700
> stan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100
> > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
> >
> > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going
> > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100
> Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
>
> > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going
> > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage
> > version .
>
> I knew about the
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > People,
> >
> > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
> > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
> >
>
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100
Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
> Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
> Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version .
I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know
about this fork.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel
wrote:
>
> People,
>
> Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
> Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
>
As I recall, in the beginning, Tenacity (to perform
most meaningful opera
On 2/7/23 1:25 PM, Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
People,
Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
Thanks,
Phil.
I have a copr[0]. It has some issues and the current version is old. I
have
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 21:03 +, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-
18 matches
Mail list logo
