Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 05/06/20 13:10 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 20:51 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jeff Law: > As we both know, GCC has had ABI bugs as well. Both compilers strive > to be ABI compatible with each other and we should continue to work > together to find and address such issues.

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16:09 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 13:58 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 21:18 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > Yes. I thought we bumped up that bug in the database so that it'd ge

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 13:58 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 21:18 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > Yes. I thought we bumped up that bug in the database so that it'd get > > > some > > > attention in the gcc-10 cycle. But I cou

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 21:18 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > Yes. I thought we bumped up that bug in the database so that it'd get some > > attention in the gcc-10 cycle. But I couldn't follow it myself, so I don't > > know > > what happened. >

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Dominique Martinet
Fabio Valentini wrote on Fri, Jun 05, 2020: > Sorry for being off-topic, but can you (Jeff) please not respond to > the mailing list digest and amend the Subject line manually? > I think it screws up the In-Reply-To (?) header in emails, so every > new email from you creates a new thread (for clien

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > Yes. I thought we bumped up that bug in the database so that it'd get some > attention in the gcc-10 cycle. But I couldn't follow it myself, so I don't > know > what happened. Sorry for being off-topic, but can you (Jeff) please not respond to t

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 20:51 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jeff Law: > > > As we both know, GCC has had ABI bugs as well. Both compilers strive > > to be ABI compatible with each other and we should continue to work > > together to find and address such issues. SImilarly both compilers > > are

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 14:11 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:16:58 +0100 > > From: Ian McInerney > > Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy > > Change > > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > >

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 12:27 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 10:14 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 04/06/20 16:30 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > > [snip] > > > == Documentation == > > > Severa