Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> I'm planning to make Maven modules parallel-installable with ursine
> packages - maven-3.6 module would not have any conflicts with any
> ursine packages. The required packaging work is already done,
> parallel-installable PoC of Maven 3.6 is available from MBI repos [1].
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 09:39 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > However, you can also download releases from the AdoptOpenJDK
> > > site. Note, those downloads are built by Red Hat's OpenJDK team so you
> > > can rely on them being up to date with all the latest security patches
> > > and critical f
On 10/28/19 12:38 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:04 AM Andrew Dinn wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2019 15:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
>>> Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
>> Please do not spread misinformation like th
> > However, you can also download releases from the AdoptOpenJDK
> > site. Note, those downloads are built by Red Hat's OpenJDK team so you
> > can rely on them being up to date with all the latest security patches
> > and critical fixes.
>
> One clarification. Not *all* builds available at AdoptO
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 11:55 +, Andrew Dinn wrote:
[...]
> However, you can also download releases from the AdoptOpenJDK
> site. Note, those downloads are built by Red Hat's OpenJDK team so you
> can rely on them being up to date with all the latest security patches
> and critical fixes.
One cl
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:52 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
> > I am planning to switch Maven 3.6 and Ant 1.10 modules to build with
> > and run on OpenJDK 11, which is the latest LTS release of OpenJDK.
> > This also means that future streams of javapackages-tools module will
> > default to use OpenJDK 11
- Original Message -
> From: "Mikolaj Izdebski"
> To: "java-devel"
> Cc: maven-ow...@fedoraproject.org, "ant-owner" ,
> mbo...@fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 1:30:32 PM
> Subject: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11
>
> Hello,
>
> Currently default Java runtime in
> > On 26/10/2019 15:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
> > > Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
> > Please do not spread misinformation like this. It is very unhelpful.
> >
>
> Okay, sure, paid support continues for two more years, bu
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:04 AM Andrew Dinn wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2019 15:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
> > Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
> Please do not spread misinformation like this. It is very unhelpful.
>
Okay, sure, paid
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 3:41 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our
> > > > “First” foundation.
> > >
> > > Simple reason - while Oracle decided to move Java to
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our “First”
> > > foundation.
> >
> > Simple reason - while Oracle decided to move Java to a faster, time
> > based release cycle the Java community essential
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:07 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> >> for some more time...
> >
> > Any reasons?
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 19:07 Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> for some more time...
> >
> > Any reasons? Default
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>
> Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our First
> foundatio
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:33:59 -0400, you wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>>
>
>If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
>Java 8 has been EOL
On 10/26/19 4:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>>
>
> If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
> Java 8 has been EOL for
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
> some more time...
>
If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 15:54 Jiri Vanek wrote:
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> for some more time...
>
Would you care to elaborate why?
Fabio
>
> On 10/25/19 8:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> Hello,
>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
> some more time...
Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our “First”
foundation.
--
Tomasz Torcz "Never underestimate
any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
some more time...
On 10/25/19 8:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Currently default Java runtime in Fedora is OpenJDK 8. This is not the
>> latest OpenJDK packaged,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 13:08 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:27 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > > > E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable
> releases if
> > > > this change is done globally and for example if Ursa Major/Prime/...
> is activated?
> >
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable
> > > releases if
> > > this change is done globally and for example if Ursa Major/Prime/... is
> > > activated?
> >
> > Changing underlying OpenJDK version of maven:3.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:30 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Currently default Java runtime in Fedora is OpenJDK 8. This is not the
> > > latest OpenJDK packaged, but
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Currently default Java runtime in Fedora is OpenJDK 8. This is not the
> > latest OpenJDK packaged, but still remains system-default version.
> > Because of that Apache Maven and
On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Hello,
Currently default Java runtime in Fedora is OpenJDK 8. This is not the
latest OpenJDK packaged, but still remains system-default version.
Because of that Apache Maven and Apache Ant in Fedora are built using
OpenJDK 8 and run on OpenJDK 8.
I a
25 matches
Mail list logo
