On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:37:45AM -, Raj J Putari wrote:
> Not sure what selinux really is but I think it makes polices based on system
> mechanics so nekto or netko the vulnerability scanner can be reversed
> engineered to generate custom policies on the fly
Well, no. It provides a policy
On 01/27/2010 08:12 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 10:50 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> If the downloads are sorted by increasing size, you basically
>> use the small ones to sample the mirrors and make a good choice
>> for the big ones at the end of the list.
>>
> Excep
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 08:51 -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > Just an idea: instead of (or in addition to) "blind" planning,
> > based on net topology, geography, declared bandwith etc.,
> > yum could use an exploration approach:
> >
> > 1
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Just an idea: instead of (or in addition to) "blind" planning,
> based on net topology, geography, declared bandwith etc.,
> yum could use an exploration approach:
>
> 1) choose a few good mirrors candidate
> 2) download one file from each o
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 10:50 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Fedora has 244 public mirrors listed at the moment, and hundreds more
> > private mirrors. We have no way, nor really any desire, to know in
> > real time the load and network capacity of any connection between
> > e
Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora has 244 public mirrors listed at the moment, and hundreds more
> private mirrors. We have no way, nor really any desire, to know in
> real time the load and network capacity of any connection between
> each mirror and each specific user. Perhaps Akamai does, but that's
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:09:35PM +0200, wrote:
>4)
>yum should select the mirror to download from in a smarter way,
>considering the current load on the mirror and the distance of the mirror
>from the user. This will help reduce the load on the mirrors and make the
>d