Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> ... I wonder why... AFAIK, GLES should be better for low resource
> systems like raspberry, isn't it?
Probably yes. KDE upstream recommends it for Plasma Mobile, and Manjaro ARM
builds a few qt5-es2-* packages (conflicting with the regular qt5-* ones)
for the comp
Il 03/12/22 19:01, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>
> Good question, I don't know. Seems glvnd provides the libraries, maybe
> that's enough?
I had a look at mesa specfile, first it is build with
-Dgles1=disabled \
-Dgles2=enabled \
but then:
# XXX can we just not build this
rm -vf %{buildroot}%{
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 12:43 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 03/12/22 16:29, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>
>
> As far as I know, Qt can only be built with one mode or another. So
> it's a mutually exclusive choice. Also, it looks like we don't have
> the GLES libraries from Mesa at all to even
Il 03/12/22 16:29, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> As far as I know, Qt can only be built with one mode or another. So
> it's a mutually exclusive choice. Also, it looks like we don't have
> the GLES libraries from Mesa at all to even make that choice. :(
So, why glxinfo on my system returns:
> OpenGL
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 9:25 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> While in the process of updating celestia package to the latest
> snapshot, I was trying to build it with qt interface and opengl_ES for
> rendering. But looking at the build logs of qt6-qtbase:
> OpenGL:
> Desktop OpenGL ..
