On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:35:55AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> > > I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> > > packagers will be available in the not too distant
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:10:22PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, if someone could try on a fedora 25 host to setup a rawhide/f26 mock
> chroot and try and build maxima in it, and see if it hangs installing
> the buildsys packages (in particular the 'time' package) that would be
> great.
I tried
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
wrote:
> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> packagers
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
>>> wrote:
I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
packagers will be available in the not to
On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
>> wrote:
>>> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
>>> packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
Hi,
On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
to debug this. Thanks for the information, Kevin.
This issu
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
> to debug this. Thanks for the information, Kevin.
This issue is now blocking a large update of sagemath a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, something about the aarch64 'time' package? Nothing really leaps to
> out at a quick glance, and wouldn't other packages hit this? and whats
> pulling in the time package anyhow?
The maxima package BuildRequires: time, for what purpose I
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:02:40 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Hey. I looked at this a few weeks ago... but I don't recall all the
> > details so I wanted to look more closely at it again before I
> > replied.
> >
> > However, I have not had time
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey. I looked at this a few weeks ago... but I don't recall all the
> details so I wanted to look more closely at it again before I replied.
>
> However, I have not had time since your orig email on saturday to do
> so.
>
> I'll try and look so
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:28:14 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jerry James
> wrote:
> > I fixed the mass rebuild FTBFS errors for clisp and ecl yesterday,
> > and started a build of maxima due to changes in both clisp and ecl.
> > Something is afoot.
>
> Is there any
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I fixed the mass rebuild FTBFS errors for clisp and ecl yesterday, and
> started a build of maxima due to changes in both clisp and ecl.
> Something is afoot.
Is there anybody here who can take a look at this? The dnf
transaction is apparentl
12 matches
Mail list logo
