On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Garrett Holmstrom
wrote:
> On 2011-07-20 9:18, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human
>>> UIDs of 500, 501, etc..?
>>>
>>> Do they suddenly become
On 2011-07-20 9:18, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human
>> UIDs of 500, 501, etc..?
>>
>> Do they suddenly become system UIDs or is login.defs left alone then
>> (and consequently
On 07/21/2011 03:42 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
>> No, applications expect system accounts and user accounts to have
>> non-overlapping ID intervals. So this would be just a more broken
>> version of keeping the limit at 500.
>
> +1. And keeping consistency with oth
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> No, applications expect system accounts and user accounts to have
> non-overlapping ID intervals. So this would be just a more broken
> version of keeping the limit at 500.
+1. And keeping consistency with other distros. Definitely the right
move, since UID=1000 is the d
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 17:08 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 17:02 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:59 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:57 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 22:59 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 17:02 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:59 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:57 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 22:59 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Antill
> > > > wrot
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:59 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:57 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 22:59 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Antill
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is it really necessary to change this in %pre ... c
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:57 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 22:59 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Antill
>> wrote:
>> > Is it really necessary to change this in %pre ... can't you just copy
>> > your old login.defs file over the installed
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:57 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 22:59 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Antill
> > wrote:
> > > Is it really necessary to change this in %pre ... can't you just copy
> > > your old login.defs file over the inst
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 22:59 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Antill
> wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to change this in %pre ... can't you just copy
> > your old login.defs file over the installed one during kickstart %post
> > (or even do it by hand, post
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 18:28 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> > I normally build systems with (at least!) a separate /boot, / and /home.
>> > This lets me do a full install, blow away old
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 18:28 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> > I normally build systems with (at least!) a separate /boot, / and /home.
> > This lets me do a full install, blow away old fedora system partitions and
> > not lose any user data.
> >
On 07/20/2011 02:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 13:52 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 01:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 12:29 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Whee
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 13:52 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 01:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 12:29 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >> On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> I normally build systems
On 07/20/2011 01:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 12:29 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I normally build systems with (at least!) a separate /boot, / and /home.
This lets m
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 16:15:34 +,
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human
> UIDs of 500, 501, etc..?
>
> Do they suddenly become system UIDs or is login.defs left alone then
> (and consequently no change happens)?
When the change w
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 12:29 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >> I normally build systems with (at least!) a separate /boot, / and /home.
> >> This lets me do a full install, blow away old fedora syst
On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> I normally build systems with (at least!) a separate /boot, / and /home.
>> This lets me do a full install, blow away old fedora system partitions and
>> not lose any user data.
>>
>> Since that
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> I normally build systems with (at least!) a separate /boot, / and /home.
> This lets me do a full install, blow away old fedora system partitions and
> not lose any user data.
>
> Since that puts down a pristine F16 image, does that mean we nee
On 07/20/2011 12:18 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 04:07 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> Fedora 16 will start user UIDs and GIDs at 1000 instead of 500[1].
>>>
>>> Unfortunately some packages need to know the boundar
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 04:07 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Fedora 16 will start user UIDs and GIDs at 1000 instead of 500[1].
>>
>> Unfortunately some packages need to know the boundary, and usually
>> hard-code it. I have checked the m
On 07/20/2011 04:07 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello all,
> Fedora 16 will start user UIDs and GIDs at 1000 instead of 500[1].
>
> Unfortunately some packages need to know the boundary, and usually
> hard-code it. I have checked the most common packages[2], but I can't
> check all 10 thousand pa
22 matches
Mail list logo
