Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-28 Thread Iain Arnell
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: >>> >> >> SO> I believe you forgot to set whenisgood to use timezones :-) >> >> My understanding is that you have to log in in order to set your >> timezone, or that c

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: >> > > SO> I believe you forgot to set whenisgood to use timezones :-) > > My understanding is that you have to log in in order to set your > timezone, or that choosing a timezone was something the responder h

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: SO> I believe you forgot to set whenisgood to use timezones :-) My understanding is that you have to log in in order to set your timezone, or that choosing a timezone was something the responder had to do. When I created the form, "Use timezones" was c

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-28 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Thu Jul 28 02:03:21 +0200 2011: > So, that was pretty good response; only one reply here, but several > names were added to the wiki page. There seem to be enough people > interested to begin moving forward. Yeah, it would be nice to make our lives

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-27 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
So, that was pretty good response; only one reply here, but several names were added to the wiki page. There seem to be enough people interested to begin moving forward. I can't think of a better place for discussion than this list, so I'll just go ahead: Could someone volunteer to co-chair this

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-27 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:01:36 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > For a while now I've wanted to get some sort of package review SIG > going. The package review process hasn't really evolved much since it > was instituted way back when, and now it (and the portion of the > sponsorship process it o